Archive for category Colorado Real Estate

July 2011 – Real Estate Market Update

We are seeing some very positive signs from the real estate market; increase in closed sales, reduction in absorption rate and stable prices.  It’s important to note that we are comparing the sales results to July of 2010 which was right after the end of the first time homebuyer tax credit but it’s still good news!  I think the media will start to pick up on the upswing in the real estate market in the next few weeks and report that the housing market is improving.  This in turn should help the stock market rebound and the rest of the year will be much stronger than second half of 2010.

Entire MLS (all areas)

Residential Highlights

  • 17.1% Increase in closed sales year over year
  • 17.9% Increase in average days on market (99)
  • 22% Decrease in active listings (14,014)
  • .5% Increase in average sold price ($298,654)

Condo/Townhome Highlights

  • 20.1% Increase in closed sales year over year
  • 17.2% Increase in averages days on market (109)
  • .7% Decrease in average sold price ($153,058)

Full report of Entire MLS

All MLS stats


Douglas County West (DCW)

Residential Highlights

  • 19.2% Decrease in closed sales year over year
  • 16.6% Decrease in active listings (1,067)
  • 12.2% Increase in absorption rate (8.4 months)
  • 5.2% Decrease in average sold price ($406,399)

Condo/Townhome Highlights

  • 25% Decrease in closed sales year over year
  • 60.8% Increase in average days on market (127)
  • 20% Decrease in average sold price ($168,658)

Full report of Douglas County West (DCW)

DCW Stats


Douglas Elbert Parker (DEP)

Residential Highlights

  • 5.1% Increase in closed sales year over year
  • 3.8% Decrease in days on market (101)
  • 6% Increase in average sold price ($364,041)

Condo/Townhome Highlights

  • 0% Change in closed sales year over year
  • 3.8%% Decrease in average days on market (100)
  • 24% Decrease in average sold price ($124,783)

Full report of Douglas Elbet Parker (DEP)

DEP Stats


Douglas Highlands Ranch Lone Tree (DHL)

Residential Highlights

  • 36.3% Increase in closed sales year over year
  • 16.4% Decrease in average days on market (61)
  • 42% Decrease in absorption rate (3.6 months)
  • 4.8% Increase in average sold price ($393,129)

Condo/Townhome Highlights

  • 17.4% Increase in closed sales year over year
  • 18.7% Decrease in aborption rate (4.7 months)
  • 10.7% Decrease in average sold price ($209,579)

Full report of Doulgas Highlands Ranch Lone Tree (DHL)

DHL Stats

Based on Information from Metrolist, Inc. for the period Jan 2009 through present.Note: This representation is based in whole or in part on data supplied by Metrolist, Inc. Metrolist, Inc. does not guarantee nor is in any way responsible for its accuracy. Data maintained by metrolist, Inc. may not reflect all real estate activity in the market.

Share

May 2011 – Real Estate Market Update Denver Colorado

Entire MLS (all areas)

Residential Highlights

  • 11.2% Decrease in closed sales year over year
  • 44% Increase in average days on market (108)
  • 14.5% Decrease in active listings (13,958)
  • 2.3% Increase in average sold price ($279,443)

Condo/Townhome Highlights

  • 26.7% Decrease in closed sales year over year
  • 43% Increase in days on market (113)
  • 1.6% Increase in average sold price ($160,051)

Full report of Entire MLS
May 2011 All


Douglas County West (DCW)

Residential Highlights

  • 2.1% Decrease in closed sales year over year
  • 8.3% Increase in days on market (131)
  • 11.1% Decrease in active listings (1.093)
  • 2.6% Increase in average sold price ($391,504)

Condo/Townhome Highlights

  • 37.5% Decrease in closed sales year over year
  • 22.6% Decrease in average days on market (55)
  • 6.3% Increase in average sold price ($173,368)

Full report of Douglas County West (DCW)

May 2011 DCW


Douglas Elbert Parker (DEP)

Residential Highlights

  • 6.2% Increase in closed sales year over year
  • 50% Increase in days on market (141)
  • .7% Increase in average sold price ($352,371)

Condo/Townhome Highlights

  • 6.3% Decrease in closed sales year over year
  • 126% Increase in average days on market (136)
  • 16% Decrease in average sold price ($114,670)

Full report of Douglas Elbet Parker (DEP)

May 2011 DEP


Douglas Highlands Ranch Lone Tree (DHL)

Residential Highlights

  • 6.6% Increase in closed sales year over year
  • 19.8% Decrease in absorption rate (3.8)
  • 3.7% Increase in average sold price ($356,120)

Condo/Townhome Highlights

  • 0% Increase in closed sales year over year
  • 20% Decrease in aborption rate (7.2 months)
  • 17.2% Increase in average sold price ($248,317)

Full report of Doulgas Highlands Ranch Lone Tree (DHL)

May 2011 DHL

Based on Information from Metrolist, Inc. for the period Jan 2009 through present.Note: This representation is based in whole or in part on data supplied by Metrolist, Inc. Metrolist, Inc. does not guarantee nor is in any way responsible for its accuracy. Data maintained by metrolist, Inc. may not reflect all real estate activity in the market.

Share

2011 Real Estate Contract Date Guide

The Contract Date Guide is here! We worked closely with Oliver Frascona to produce this years contract date guide and have added color-coded “zones” — which is how Oliver Frascona presents this information in his classes. We’ve also added a second page of federal holidays to assist you in filling out dates on your contracts.

2011 Real Estate Contract Date Guide

2011ContractDateGuide_JimRenshaw

Share

Under Contracts down 27% in May 2010

May 2010 posted very strong sold results with the overall market up 20% in closed residential sales and 23% increase in condo/townhome sales compared to May 20o9.  The expiration of the home buyer tax credit program spurred good sale results but also left us with a little bit of a hangover for new homes going under contract.

May 2010 residential under contracts decreased by 27% compared to this time last year.  My best guess is that we will see a decrease in closed residential sales for the next 30-60 days.

May 2010 Under Contract Metrolist Sales

Based on Information from Metrolist, Inc. for the period Jan 2008 through present.Note: This representation is based in whole or in part on data supplied by Metrolist, Inc. does not guarantee nor is in any way responsible for its accuracy. Data maintained by Metrolist, Inc. may not reflect all real estate activity in the market.

Share

Tags:

Money available to first-time homebuyers from Douglas County Housing Partnership

For local first-time homebuyers even considering a new home purchase, it just doesn’t get better than this.

First Time Homebuyer Money

First Time Homebuyer Money

In addition to the federal stimulus tax credit available through April 30, the Douglas County Housing Partnership has received $1 million dollars it must distribute by Sept. 10, 2010. What isn’t distributed by that date is returned to the federal government.

The partnership is calling this its Shared Equity Home Buying Program, which will provide qualifying homebuyers an investment of up to 20 percent of the purchase price of their homes. The investment is available to homebuyers who currently live or work in Douglas County and is a deferred loan, which must be repaid upon sale or refinance of the home. At that time, the homebuyer/borrower must return the same investment percentage to the partnership based on the current fair market value.

Who is eligible:

• First-time homebuyers, including people who have not owned a home during the past three years, single parents or “displaced homemakers” who have previously owned a home with a spouse

• Borrowers who currently live or work within the limits of Douglas County

• Those with an income of 120 percent of the Area Median Income:

1 person: $63,850 4 persons: $91,200

2 persons: $73,000 5 persons: $98,400

3 persons: $82,000 6 persons: $105,850

Which homes are eligible:

• Foreclosed properties in designated census tract block groups (use the contact information below to learn specific neighborhoods)

• Properties priced $300,000 or less

• Homes with an appraised value of at least 1 percent more than the purchase price

Qualified homebuyers will be required to:

• Have their home inspection reviewed by the housing partnership

• Attend a free Colorado Housing and Finance Authority class

• Secure a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage with a maximum 45 percent debt-to-income ratio

• Contribute $1,000 toward the purchase price

• Occupy the home as their primary residence

• Meet with the partnership for approval; pay a $100 application fee

For more information on the Shared Equity Home Buying Program, contact Travis Anderson, program manager, at 303-784-7857 or go to douglascountyhousingpartnership.org.

Share

Tags:

Colorado Foreclosure Sales Skyrocket

Comparing year-over-year from 2009 to 2010, foreclosure filings in January decreased 3.2 percent overall with totals falling from 2,819 to 2,729. Foreclosure sales increased 60.7 percent from 1,193 to 1,917.

However, when compared to January 2008, both foreclosure filings and foreclosure sales were down. January filings decreased 17.4 percent from January 2008 to January 2010, and foreclosure sales fell 29.2 percent during the same period.

The increase in foreclosure sales rates between January 2009 and January 2010 can in part be attributed to an exceptionally low number of foreclosures proceeding to sale during the early months of 2009. This resulted from a series of moratoria on foreclosures imposed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other large owners of mortgage loans. The moratoria prevented foreclosures from proceeding to the end of the process, but did not reflect overall improvement in the real estate markets. As the moratoria were phased out in the Spring of 2009, foreclosure sales totals began to increase.

Source: Colorado Department of Local Affairs – Division of Housing

Share

Tags:

Foreclosure Filings (NED) Increase in 3rd Quarter

When comparing the third quarters of 2008 and 2009, new foreclosure (NED) filings increased in most Counties.

Year-over-year changes in 3rd Q foreclosure filings in Colorado Counties

County 2008 (3rd Q
only)
2009 (3rd Q
only)
Year-over-year %
change
Adams 1069 1456 36%
Arapahoe 963 1699 76%
Boulder 201 447 122%
Broomfield 58 78 34%
Denver 979 1637 67%
Douglas 340 739 117%
El Paso 869 1427 64%
Jefferson 713 1050 47%
Larimer 346 555 60%
Mesa 116 373 222%
Pueblo 258 420 63%
Weld 560 905 62%
Share

Homebuyer credit tentatively extend by Senate

The Senate has tentatively agreed to extend the existing $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers and also offer a new $6,500 credit for existing homeowners who have lived in their current residence for a consecutive five-year period in the past eight years.

Home buyers must be under contract by April 30, 2010, and close before July 1. Some House Democrats have expressed concern about the high cost of the tax credit for the government, and allegations of abuse have resulted in an IRS probe of the program.

Share

Tags:

Amended RESPA Regulations take effect January 1, 2010

New GFE Forms and HUD-1 Settlement Statements to be mandatory

In November 2008, HUD issued a Final Rule amending Regulation X relating to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (RESPA). Several of these changes were implemented in 2009, but the majority of changes, including the mandatory use of the new Good Faith Estimate (GFE) and modified HUD-1 Settlement Statement will go into effect January 1, 2010. With the implementation date fast approaching, it is imperative that Realtors understand how these new RESPA Rules will affect their clients’ HUD-1 Settlement Statements and possibly their closings.

Purposes of new GFE and HUD-1

HUD’s earliest attempts at RESPA reform date back to 2002, and its goals for reform have always been the same: to provide more simplicity, clarity, transparency, and certainty of mortgage costs for consumers. In a nutshell, the new regulation mandates changes concerning when and how loan information is disclosed to the client. These new forms and procedures are intended to make it easier for borrowers to understand the costs and terms of their loan transaction. According to HUD’s news release, these new forms are designed to help consumers shop for the lowest cost mortgage and avoid costly and potentially harmful loan offers. HUD will require, for the first time ever, that lenders and mortgage brokers provide consumers with a standard Good Faith Estimate (GFE) that clearly discloses key loan terms and closing costs. HUD estimates that by improving upfront disclosures in the GFE and limiting the amount estimated charges can change, the new procedures may save the borrower hundreds of dollars in junk fees and hidden costs.

New Mandatory GFE Form

Currently, loan originators are required to deliver a GFE to borrowers in all RESPArelated transactions, but the specific language is not mandated. The new standardized GFE used as of January 1, 2010, is three pages long and must contain the exact language specified by HUD. HUD says the new GFE will “consolidate closing costs into major categories to prevent junk fees and display total settlement costs prominently on the first page so the consumer can easily compare loan offers. HUD will specify the closing costs that can and cannot change at settlement. If a fee changes, HUD will limit the amount it can change.” The Final Rule specifies which types of charges can change, which charges cannot increase by more than 10%, and which charges cannot change at all. The lender or mortgage broker must provide the borrower with the GFE within 3 business days of loan application. With the exception of the credit report, no other fees can be charged until after the applicant receives the GFE. The new GFE must state dates and terms related to the loan, including loan amount, term, rate, rate lock date, requirements for impounds, pre-payment penalties, balloons, adjustments, and all charges associated with the loan including loan origination, appraisal, credit report, etc. The terms and prices quoted (except for the interest rate and charges related to the interest rate) must be available for at least10 days following issuance of the GFE. If certain information or circumstances change after the GFE is issued, a new GFE may be required.

Tolerances in the GFE

Quoted costs in the GFE are subject to “tolerances,” which are defined as the maximum amount by which the charge for a category or categories of settlements may exceed the amount of the estimate on the GFE. There are three tolerance categories:

• Zero Tolerance: There may be no variance in fees quoted. This applies to lender charges for taking, underwriting, and processing the application, including points, origination fees, and yield spread premium.

• 10% Tolerance: These fees cannot vary more than 10% in any given category. Categories include settlement services where the lender selects the provider, settlement services where the borrower selects the provider from the lender’s list, title services and title insurance if the lender selects the provider, and recording fees.

• Unlimited Tolerance: Variance in these items is allowed without limitation, including services where the borrower can choose providers, like escrow and title insurance, impounds for taxes, per diem interest, and the cost of homeowners insurance.

The final page of the GFE also contains worksheet-like charges to compare different loans and terms that the borrower can use to shop pricing.

New HUD-1 Settlement Statement

The most significant changes to the new HUD-1 Settlement Statement were made with the intention of having consumers be able to easily compare their settlement charges on the GFE with those on the HUD-1. Here are some of the major changes to the new HUD:

• All fees customarily paid by the buyer that will be paid by the seller must now be disclosed in the borrower’s column on the HUD and offset with a credit from the seller to the buyer on page 1 of the HUD. The premium for the owner’s title policy (even though customarily paid by the seller) must also be disclosed in the buyer’s column and offset with a credit on page 1, since it now appears on the buyer’s GFE.

• Real estate commission percentages are no longer disclosed on the HUD. The total amount of the commission to each agent or broker must be shown on line 701 and 702, and the total commissions disbursed must be shown as a seller (or buyer) charge on line 703.

• All loan origination charges (underwriting, processing, etc.) are included in one bundle on line 801 called “our origination charge” and are not itemized separately on the HUD.

• The charge to the buyer for “title services” and “lender’s title insurance” is disclosed as one lump sum on line 1101. Any title fees paid to third party providers must be itemized. Additionally, the premium split between the title agent and title underwriter must be disclosed on lines 1107 and 1108.

• Finally, the charges reflected on the GFE and the HUD-1 are compared on the page 3 of the new HUD-1 to determine if the totals fall within the permitted tolerances.

What does this mean for your closing?

If there is a difference between the costs quoted on the GFE and the final numbers on the HUD-1, RESPA’s Final Rule provides a unique solution. The loan originator has the opportunity to “cure” any violation of the tolerance by reimbursing the borrower any amounts by which tolerances were exceeded, either at the closing or within 30 days of settlement. (HUD deems a payment timely if it is placed in the mail by the loan originator within 30 calendar days of the closing.)

Share

Real Estate Market Update with New Charts

I’m testing out new chart for analyzing the Colorado real estate market. Please let me know your thought by posting comments below. Thanks

Inventory levels are extremely flat so far this year

Based on Information from Metrolist, Inc. for the period Jan 2006 through present.Metrolist, Inc. Note: This representation is based in whole or in part on data supplied by Metrolist, Inc. does not guarantee nor is in any way responsible for its accuracy. Data maintained by metrolist, Inc. may not reflect all real estate activity in the market.

Share